Thursday, December 16, 2021 by JD Heyes
A letter written last year to the Justice Department by a Democratic whistleblower in Arizona claims that fellow Democrats in Pima County added as many as 35,000 votes to the party’s candidates during the 2020 election, and of course, nothing was done about it.
“This information came out Monday, during an ‘ad hoc’ hearing in Tucson, where Arizona State House and Senate members met to discuss election integrity issues in Pima County,” American Greatness reporter Debra Heine wrote this week.
Heine noted further that during the hearing, witnesses gave testimony and provided evidence regarding alleged voting irregularities that occurred during the 2020 election, “including ballots from people not living where they voted, and inflated voter rolls across the Democrat-leaning county.”
The letter, dated Nov. 10 and addressed to the Justice Department’s criminal division, was read into the record by state Rep. Mark Finchem (R), a candidate for Arizona secretary of state next year who has received former President Donald Trump’s endorsement.
Per American Greatness, the letter, in full, says:
Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020. There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.
In a meeting I was invited to by the Democrat party in Pima County, Arizona on September 10, 2020, no phones or recording devices were allowed. A presentation was given including detailed plans to embed 35,000 votes in a spread configured distribution to each Democrat candidate’s vote totals.
When I asked, “How in the world would 35,000 votes be kept hidden, or from being discovered?” It was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the total registered vote range and will not exceed the registered voter count. And the 35,000 was determined allowable for Pima County based on our county registered voter count.
It was also stated total voter turnout versus total registered voters determined how many votes we can embed. The embedding will also adjust based on voter turnout. Because the embedded votes are distributed sporadically, all embedded votes will not be found if audited because embeds are in groups of approximately 1,000. This is so the County Recorder can declare an oversight issue or error, as a group of 1,000 is a normal and acceptable error.
Maricopa County’s embed totals will be substantially larger than Pima, due to embeds being calculated based on the total number of registered voters. When I asked, “Has this ever been tested, and how do we know it works?” the response was, yes, this has been tested and has shown significant success in Arizona judicial retention elections, since 2014. Even undetectable in post audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes and the full potential of the total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters. This year our Secretary of State has removed precinct level detail from election night releases, so candidates can’t see precinct over-votes.
This is what I have from this meeting. Just thought I’d report this. Not sure if you can do anything since I was unable to have a recording device at this meeting. Thank You.
The whistleblower chose to remain anonymous and did not want to be involved in any subsequent investigation.
Finchem noted that state lawmakers were cc’ed on the email, adding that in the months that followed, they conducted a “very quiet, but fruitful investigation.”
He added that investigators managed to verify the IP address of the computer from which the email was sent, and that was located in Tucson, Ariz., which is located in Pima County. However, they were not able to identify the whistleblower — not that it matters, because Biden’s DoJ never responded.
Trump is aware of the ‘discrepancies,’ as evidenced by the fact that his spokeswoman, Liz Harrington, has tweeted them out.
Voting Age Population: 182
Registered "Voters": 288
158% Registration Rate
With single locations having 173
registered "voters" pic.twitter.com/N7j8KrITEO
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 13, 2021
40 registered voters at a CBP office in Lukeville, Arizona pic.twitter.com/hhyvyZjAND
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 13, 2021
Keep in mind, Trump supposedly only lost Arizona by about 11,000 votes — oh, and the state now has two Democratic senators though it is governed by Republicans (and convincingly so).
It’s obvious Democrats have stolen our electoral system.
Read more on this subject at VoteFraud.news.
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FAKE POLLS NEWS